Hello, this is a situation where I could use immediate assistance.
This is a one page case outlined as per what a legal layman sees as my case other than the obvious.
GM has admitted to their attack in a private apology letter (please bear with me on this cut and paste info):
John L Mealer has spent 25 years designing and developing green automobiles, power sources and alternative fuels prior to finally, officially registering (200
as such a business entity called Mealer Companies LLC in order to seek funding. Mealer was in multiple positive discussions/tentative agreements with various large funding firms / private individuals to gather needed capital to launch this major business venture.
Mealer's Claim (amongst others)
INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE
Nature of the Tort of Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage
The elements of that tort of are:
1. an economic relationship between [the plaintiff and some third person] containing the probability of future economic benefit to the [plaintiff],
JL Mealer, while searching and discussing funding for his alternative fuels, automotive mfg business with multiple funding groups, individuals, engineers, engineering companies, fabrication companies, et al, was attacked and irreparably blackened, libeled, other wise made to lose these funding accounts by GM - GMAC employees who later apologized for the events.
2. knowledge by the defendant of the existence of the relationship,
GM-GMAC employee entered Mealer's investor oriented website, signing up as a blogger calling himself “MONEY01” then proceeded to destroy and blacken Mealer's reputation, name, company value and over-all funding viability of Mealer's future projects and business in whole with his remarks while also claiming to be a “real' engineer of “real' automobiles” and then ending his tirade with “I wish you ALL the worst the world can give a self serving pathetic MORON.”
3. intentional acts on the part of the defendant designed to disrupt the relationship,
GM-GMAC employee signing on as MONEY01 provides proof he knew a money source was the objective of Mealer's website, and the over-all defamation and attack proves MALICE along with the apology as described in detail for GM-GMAC employee's attack.
4. actual disruption of the relationship, [and] (5) damages to the plaintiff proximately caused by the acts of the defendant.' (Buckaloo v. Johnson (1975) 14 Cal.3d 815, 827.)
I have lost all business since the attacks which resulted in this BK which is now in federal court as GMAC is going for my home, my name has been blackened and the local gov't who was working with me wants little to do with me. Federal BK judge wants an answer as far as legal representation by Mar 3rd before allowing GMAC their lift of automatic stay, but suggested "We will take it (the case) from there" when I return with a response to the his concerns of my legal representation.
John Mealer
JL Mealer
Mealer Companies LLC
http://mealercompanies.com
America's Next Major Automaker
& 100% Self-Regenerative-Fueled
High Capacity Electricity Producing Device MFG
Tort Interference with admission by large corp
Linear Mode
