Header

Forum Left Top
Welcome to the LawInfo’s Legal Forums
By joining us today you can participate in our active and growing community. You will first need to register in order to participate in the discussion boards, using a login name and password. Click here to be directed to the registration page.

Lawinfo Home >> Click Here For Exclusive Statewide Sponsorship


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2012, 10:59 AM
MacDaddy MacDaddy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Default Statue of Limitations

I was arrested for theft over three years ago. This is a civil matter and the people accusing me actually owe me money. ($484,000) The DA will not bring it to trial. My attorney told me to lay low and the Statue of Limitations would run out in December. That was 7 months or so ago. So, here we are in January and still no trial. When I talked to my attorney today, he said he didn't say that and that it would definitely go to trial. He said the Statue of Limitations did not apply in my case. What is going on here? The original charge was theft by deception. Arrest date was December 2008. This attorney told me that he had asked for a speedy trial and filed the paperwork early in this process, first six months.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2012, 01:31 PM
aardvarc aardvarc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,890
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacDaddy View Post
I was arrested for theft over three years ago. This is a civil matter and the people accusing me actually owe me money. ($484,000)
There may be some civil components to the disagreement between you and some other party over property, but the state is prosecuting at least some aspects as a criminal matter. In a civil matter, the other party to the dispute would be suing you directly.


Quote:
The DA will not bring it to trial.
Has the DA told you this? Were you ever arraigned (formally charged)?


Quote:
My attorney told me to lay low and the Statue of Limitations would run out in December.
Ok, follow you there. Yes, there should only be a 3 year SOL from the time the crime is "complete" until the state must bring their charge, UNLESS it was tolled for some reason (put on hold due to things like you being out of the state).


Quote:
When I talked to my attorney today, he said he didn't say that and that it would definitely go to trial. He said the Statue of Limitations did not apply in my case.
There are several reasons this might be, the most common being that the crime is/was still occurring over a period of time, as opposed to a single act of theft that occurred at one moment - most often seen with fraudulent rental or other longer term endeavors. Without knowing the specifics of the crime, which you should NOT post on the internet, we can't really provide much guidance. If your attorney is telling you that the SOL is still alive for your case, that's who I'd be listening to. Ask them to explain on what grounds is the SOL not applicable.

Quote:
What is going on here? The original charge was theft by deception.
Yes, this does appear to be subject to the 3 year limitation.


Quote:
Arrest date was December 2008. This attorney told me that he had asked for a speedy trial and filed the paperwork early in this process, first six months.
Do you know what response, if any, was received from the court regarding the speedy trial request?
__________________
While pointers can be helpful, ultimately the number one lesson in any legal action is: don't take legal advice from books, family, friends, co-workers, police officers, grocery clerks, web sites, or people on legal message boards. The only person who can give YOU legal advice is YOUR attorney.

http://www.aardvarc.org
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2012, 06:28 PM
moderator moderator is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,249
Default

Once you are charged with the crime, the statute of limitations is tolled. As for whether or not you have been afforded a speedy trial that is different in each state and is a question for an attorney that practices in your state. Continuances by a defendant can waive the right to a speedy trial. Have you browsed through the information in LawInfo's Free Legal Resource Center to learn more about your issue yet? See: http://www.lawinfo.com/consumer.html and http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/index.html. You can certainly try to speak to a lawyer to determine what legal options may be available. In the meantime, you may be able to learn more on your own. Search the "Free Legal Resources" tab, or browse the Consumer Resources. Good luck.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Forum Right Top
Forum Left Bottom Forum Right Bottom
 
Right Left
Member Login
Forgot password?

Not a member? Click Here to Register.
Forum LeftForum Right


Attorney Search
1. Choose an Area Of Law


2. Choose Your Location

   

 

Forum LeftForum Right


Most Popular Forums:
Immigration
(Federal)
 5829
Texas
(Family Law)
 5505
California
(Business and Corporation)
 2748
California
(Family Law)
 2675
California
(Labor and Employment)
 2039
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 56,291
Total Threads: 29,463
Total Posts: 67,319
There are 46 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum LeftForum Right
Right Right
Right Bottom Left Right Bottom Right