Header

Forum Left Top
Welcome to the LawInfo’s Legal Forums
By joining us today you can participate in our active and growing community. You will first need to register in order to participate in the discussion boards, using a login name and password. Click here to be directed to the registration page.

Lawinfo Home >> Click Here For Exclusive Statewide Sponsorship


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-01-2008, 01:36 PM
ty1939
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Property Easements

The town I live in (Riverhead, NY) claims to have an 11-foot easement into my property from the street. When the town highway department snowplows the street and damaged my mailbox, lights mounted on light pears within the easement the town claims it is not responsible for the damages. I live on a residential street, however, the type of plows used are for use on highways and rural roads.

What recourse do I have?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-02-2008, 11:44 AM
lawford lawford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pierce County, Washington State
Posts: 187
Default easement by necessity

Hello,

The type of easement you are referring to is an "easement by necessity." Municipalities/counties claim such easements to ensure the practical use of the connecting property (the road). This is why there are rules regarding height, location and distance from the road regarding mailboxes. These rules ensure that the mail delivery person's vehicle doesn't create an obstruction to the road during delivery, or any excess danger to the delivery driver by traffic. Or in your case, maintenance of the road during snow. Generally, it is the landowner who benefits from the mailbox, but the public as a whole who benefits from the road. This is why the landowner has the obligation to maintain the mailbox per the requirements.

Now, picture a snowplow following an imaginary line as close to the boxes as possible. If a mailbox protrudes that line, it can be damaged accidentally by a plow driver who is distracted in operating the plow.

So, to prove any liability, you must prove that the box was in a legally compliant location, and at the correct height. But even proving this, you may find that there are ordinances disclaiming liability for maintenance of the roads by the municipality. If it was a private contracter doing the work, this could be a different situation.

I personally think that it is a far easier matter to fix the box, than to prove any liability by the city or county. You may even find yourself subject to fine or penalty if you do not fix it, to specifications, within a given time. Of course you can post some formal or informal complaint, but such things are usually determined by the city in regard to quantity of complaints, and/or the extent of damage. Meanwhile, you are non-compliant and subject to fine.

Is this fair? Not to you, but in the balance, the public must be able to travel a road free from snow. Maybe a better way of saying it is, it's fair because it applys to everyone. If it was your neighbors box, he would be in the same position.

As always, if your situation is just too offensive to you, consult an attorney about your options. Sorry I couldn't help more, and good luck,

Lawford
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-2008, 02:33 PM
ty1939
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawford View Post
Hello,

The type of easement you are referring to is an "easement by necessity." Municipalities/counties claim such easements to ensure the practical use of the connecting property (the road). This is why there are rules regarding height, location and distance from the road regarding mailboxes. These rules ensure that the mail delivery person's vehicle doesn't create an obstruction to the road during delivery, or any excess danger to the delivery driver by traffic. Or in your case, maintenance of the road during snow. Generally, it is the landowner who benefits from the mailbox, but the public as a whole who benefits from the road. This is why the landowner has the obligation to maintain the mailbox per the requirements.

Now, picture a snowplow following an imaginary line as close to the boxes as possible. If a mailbox protrudes that line, it can be damaged accidentally by a plow driver who is distracted in operating the plow.

So, to prove any liability, you must prove that the box was in a legally compliant location, and at the correct height. But even proving this, you may find that there are ordinances disclaiming liability for maintenance of the roads by the municipality. If it was a private contracter doing the work, this could be a different situation.

I personally think that it is a far easier matter to fix the box, than to prove any liability by the city or county. You may even find yourself subject to fine or penalty if you do not fix it, to specifications, within a given time. Of course you can post some formal or informal complaint, but such things are usually determined by the city in regard to quantity of complaints, and/or the extent of damage. Meanwhile, you are non-compliant and subject to fine.

Is this fair? Not to you, but in the balance, the public must be able to travel a road free from snow. Maybe a better way of saying it is, it's fair because it applys to everyone. If it was your neighbors box, he would be in the same position.

As always, if your situation is just too offensive to you, consult an attorney about your options. Sorry I couldn't help more, and good luck,

Lawford
Lawford, Thank you for your response. Do you not see any liability when the wrong plows are being used? The mailbox was and is installed following the US Postal Service guidelines.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-02-2008, 03:10 PM
lawford lawford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pierce County, Washington State
Posts: 187
Default reply

Hello again,

Perhaps, but in view of municipal codes that may disclaim liability, the reasons for the damage may prove moot. Remember, however, I am not an expert, especially on the laws of your state or community. Hopefully someone with more experience than I will answer your thread. good luck

Lawford
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Forum Right Top
Forum Left Bottom Forum Right Bottom
 
Right Left
Member Login
Forgot password?

Not a member? Click Here to Register.
Forum LeftForum Right


Attorney Search
1. Choose an Area Of Law


2. Choose Your Location

   

 

Forum LeftForum Right


Most Popular Forums:
Immigration
(Federal)
 5829
Texas
(Family Law)
 5505
California
(Business and Corporation)
 2748
California
(Family Law)
 2675
California
(Labor and Employment)
 2039
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 56,290
Total Threads: 29,463
Total Posts: 67,317
There are 42 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum LeftForum Right
Right Right
Right Bottom Left Right Bottom Right