"Petition for an Answer to an Open Legal Question - On Behalf of the People's Wright to Circumvent Political Corruption"

** Background Summary Provoking The Question **

Currently the federal attorney general is not pursuing prosecution of Wall Street banking institutions and their officers, although private attorney interests continue to seek assistance in removing state's attorneys who are obstructing justice.

Why Prosecutors Don't Go After Wall Street "You've always seen on Capitol Hill, staffers who go in and out, working for senators and then working for lobbyists and then working for companies. You're seeing it a lot at the DOJ. There was a time from 2002 until 2008 that financial-law businesses were booming and there were a lot of law firms hiring any prosecutor who had financial expertise, and a lot of those prosecutors have gone back to government or cycled back out, so the ties between the [legal] defence community and the DOJ have gotten particularly strong when it comes to financial sorts of cases."

How the Financial Crisis Created A New Third Word "[Those trades] enabled the Greek government to book upfront a big profit, but down the road [the Greek government] would have to repay Goldman Sachs quite a bit," Lewis says. "So [Goldman Sachs] lent the government money without saying that's what they were doing. If you did this in the corporate world, a bunch of people would be put in jail. They helped the Greek government rig its books so that they looked acceptable to the European Union so they'd be admitted to the euro[zone]."


** Framing the Question - An Inquiry for Preconditions Withstanding that Provision for Citizen Grand Juries that are Formed Independent From/With the State **

Given the history of grand juries as quoted in the evidence in the area below sub-titled "Original Implementation by Citizens", the following legal question is presented on behalf of the citizens of the United States.

"For a redress of citizen grievances and its necessary purposes in usurping corruption within the Department of Justice, do private citizens continue to retain the wrights to convene and bring forth a grand jury, prosecutor, and indictment which is independent from and without prohibition or enactment from a state's prosecuting attorney?"

By premise, it is only through a lapse of memory and convention that wrights to convene grand juries through private prosecution has been informally conceded to the Department of Justice.

Whereby it is asserted that the public retains wrights to convene a grand jury to hear a charge that is brought forward and represented by a plaintiff, whom is independent from a department of justice, and establish an indictment, whereby a department of justice must provision all conveniences for law to the duly formed body for prosecution and incarceration.

Furthermore, it is asserted that a private grand jury may pursue the justice department for obstruction of justice if so evident.


** Original Implementation By Citizens **

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_jury#United_States
In the early decades of the United States grand juries played a major role in public matters. ... Any citizen could bring a matter before a grand jury directly, from a public work that needed repair, to the delinquent conduct of a public official, to a complaint of a crime, and grand juries could conduct their own investigations. In that era most criminal prosecutions were conducted by private parties, either a law enforcement officer, a lawyer hired by a crime victim or his family, or even by laymen. A layman could bring a bill of indictment to the grand jury; if the grand jury found there was sufficient evidence for a trial, that the act was a crime under law, and that the court had jurisdiction, it would return the indictment to the complainant. The grand jury would then appoint the complaining party to exercise the authority of an attorney general, that is, one having a general power of attorney to represent the state in the case.

__________________
genetic religion - genetic existence is a necessary condition for the strong anthropic principle

I am not really sure what you are asking.

"Foundation for Relief from Political Corruption"

** Break Down **

It is necessary to retain a wright by the people to initiate grand juries independently from any initiation by the department of justice, whereby the independent grand juries formed by the people must have equal standing with the authority of the department of justice to enforce law.

When the department of justice is no longer willing to enforcing the principles of law then the people can lose recourse to justice, whether it be justice against private institutions or against government itself.

The department of justice is obstructing justice by declining and preventing the prosecution of criminal acts by wall street participants who contributed to the current economic collapse, which is a consequence of intermingling between the legal entities from the department of justice, the government, and the banking system itself.

The ability of the people to initiate grand juries independently from government for the enforce laws must be preserved, or established, and the intent of this thread is to resolve the legal standing for that wright or precedent.

__________________
genetic religion - genetic existence is a necessary condition for the strong anthropic principle

Is there a legal question in any of that?

__________________
While pointers can be helpful, ultimately the number one lesson in any legal action is: don't take legal advice from books, family, friends, co-workers, police officers, grocery clerks, web sites, or people on legal message boards. The only person who can give YOU legal advice is YOUR attorney.

http://www.aardvarc.org

"Specified Question"

__________________
genetic religion - genetic existence is a necessary condition for the strong anthropic principle

Have you browsed through the information in LawInfo's Free Legal Resource Center to learn more about your issue yet? See: http://www.lawinfo.com/consumer.html and http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/index.html. You can certainly try to speak to a lawyer to determine what legal options may be available. In the meantime, you may be able to learn more on your own. Search the "Free Legal Resources" tab, or browse the Consumer Resources. Good luck.