Header

Forum Left Top
Welcome to the LawInfo’s Legal Forums
By joining us today you can participate in our active and growing community. You will first need to register in order to participate in the discussion boards, using a login name and password. Click here to be directed to the registration page.

Lawinfo Home >> Click Here For Exclusive Statewide Sponsorship


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2011, 09:45 PM
nneemmoo nneemmoo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Default International student needs help ASAP!

Hello everyone,
Im an international student from Sweden.
I have a very complicated project I need to accomplish by this wednesday.
I just need some directions toward what laws apply and so. I really appriciate all answers, and please for the most efficient way , email your answers to nimaeil@hotmail.com . Once again, thank you!
This is the case :
Facts: At 11:00 p.m. the Santa Barbara County Fire Department extinguished a small hay fire in a barn. At 11:15 p.m. sheriff Carr walked through the barn and detected the odor of gasoline. At 11:45 on his way back to the office, Carr stopped a speeding truck on a nearby road, driven by David. Carr observed that while cruising to a stop, David bent down twice toward the floor. Carr walked to the truck and ordered David to get out. David complied and closed the car door behind him. Carr then wrote a traffic ticket, handed it to David, and told David he could go. As David reopened the truck door, Carr saw a red gasoline can on the floor. Carr thereupon arrested David. Transporting gasoline in a vehicle’s interior is a misdemeanor. Carr promptly read David the Miranda warning, and asked if he would waive his rights. David shrugged his shoulders. Carr then commented: “I guess some people don’t know much about setting a good fire.” David responded: “I didn’t try to burn the barn.” Carr seized the can, told David he was a suspect in an arson investigation and removed him to the jail. Later, authorities learned that David owned the barn, but that he had leased the barn to a tenant. At trial, David asserts that all of the evidence obtained should be excluded because the search of the barn was illegal, the arrest was invalid, and his statement was made in violation of his rights.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Forum Right Top
Forum Left Bottom Forum Right Bottom
 
Right Left
Member Login
Forgot password?

Not a member? Click Here to Register.
Forum LeftForum Right


Attorney Search
1. Choose an Area Of Law


2. Choose Your Location

   

 

Forum LeftForum Right


Most Popular Forums:
Immigration
(Federal)
 5829
Texas
(Family Law)
 5505
California
(Business and Corporation)
 2748
California
(Family Law)
 2675
California
(Labor and Employment)
 2039
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 56,282
Total Threads: 29,462
Total Posts: 67,316
There are 59 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum LeftForum Right
Right Right
Right Bottom Left Right Bottom Right