There is a big difference between "walking around" and "working" ---the test of which is a consideration of "IS THE JOB GETTING DONE?" Some jobs entail "walking around" ( cutting grass, washing cars, etc). But, it is possible to "walk around" and the grass is still high and the car isn't washed. The difference between working and just walking around is one gets the job done, the other one doesn't.
I don't know the nature of the business, but I do find it interesting that this particular scenario has occurred at two jobs your child has had. You ask how the supervisor knows if she is working or walking around? She didn't assume---The answer is obvious----the job ( apparently ) wasn't getting done.
Bottom line: They are required to pay your daughter for the hours she was at work ( whether walking around or actually accomplishing anything). A contractual obligtion of employment doesn't state, EMPLOYEE GETS PAID ONLY IF WORK DONE TO THE STANDARD DETERMINED BY THE SUPERVISOR ON DUTY'. Obviously, work would get done and people wouldn't get paid. They are not obligated to pay her above and beyond those hours she was in person at work and on the clock.
|