Drug testing violates the logic of custody and sabotages the purpose of drug intervention.

The logic of custody is the ability to apprehend the causes and never the consequences.

Drug testing is a system that makes quota by pursuing the "drug user" .

The "drug user" is a consequence and not a "cause'.

To pursue the consequence only permits the causes, but to pursue the cause, prevents, halts or stops the consequence.

Drug testing endorses the progress of drug supply in order to quota pursuit to detect the drug user.

The only way to detect or pursue a drug user is to allow the progress of drug supply.

The drug supply recruits the user; but the user does not induce or manufacture the drug supply.

Drug testing does not prevent the causes; in fact it only endorses the progress of causes in order to qualify a process to quota the pursuit of consequences or "drug user".

The drug user is consequent of allowing the causes of supply.

The logic of pursuit is any ability to pursue the "causes" instead of the "consequence" in order to enforce the lawful order of "custody".

Drug testing violates the logic of custody, because it corrupts the logic of pursuit.

Drug testing corrupts the logic of pursuit, because it promotes the quota to apprehend the consequence or "drug user", but to apprehend the consequence is to only permit or allow the cause.

Consequences accumulate by ignoring the pursuit of causes.

To ignor the pursuit of causes enhances or strengthens the progress of consequence.

To pursue the consequence forfeits the logic of custody.

To pursue the cause endorses the logic of custody.

Drug testing forfeits the logic of custody.

Drug testing relies on allowing the "causes" or drug supply in order to enhance the recruit of a drug user, for instigating the pursuit of "consequence" by sequence of process in compliance of the cause.

Drug testing is a utensil of criminal politics used to defile or mislead lawful order in the pursuit to apprehend the causes of supply.

Drug testing teaches followership to abandon the chain of lawful order or "custody".

Drug testing teaches a propaganda of mental habitation to pledge allegiance of destroying the leaderships capability of any progress to "pursue" apprehension of the causes.

Drug testing is a system that pursues the quota of a drug user or "consequences" in order to confide, or endorse the "causes".

Any system that pursues the quota of a drug user or "consequences" endorses or permits the progress of drug supply or "causes".

Any system that corrupts the logic of pursuit is for the purpose of installing damage to the insight to apprehend the "causes'".

Any propaganda that forces, persuades, or seduces a province, and or nation into forfeiting the logic of custody, for surrendering to the quota of pursuing "consequences" instead of apprehending the "cause" is the process of sedition.

Any propaganda that forces pursuit to abandon the causes and conform to the quota of consequence initiates the progress of sedition to syndicate the defiance, or rejection to prevent any divisible authority attempting to apprehend the cause.

The pursuit to quota the consequence is a tactic used to conceal the causes for the intent to overthrow, uproot, unseat or sabotage the legitimacy of divisible authority acting to halt the cause.

The pursuit to quota the consequence is a scheme to sabotage the merit of title and deed accrued by the delegations of custody designated to apprehend the causes as opposed to the consequence.

Drug testing is propaganda to keep people in the mental bondage of chasing the consequence with disregard to apprehend the cause.

Drug testing promotes the mental bondage of making people habitual to the pursuit of consequences instead of the causes in order to incite a plan to disband lawful order.

Any plan that uses mental bondage to keep people slaved to consequence in order to conceal the causes only implicates the provocation to install, implant or impose a process of counterfeit.

Drug testing teaches leadership to surrender to counterfeit, by corrupting the logic of pursuit and is intended to prevent the goal of target acquisition used in armed forces defense tactics.

Drug testing is a decoy to sabotage the department of defense " rules of engagement", regarding weapons release authority.

Drug testing provocates a system of entrapment in order to keep people captive to concentration camps of mental instruction that allows the criminal to blame the victim.

Drug testing allows the criminal or "causes" to proceed unopposed in order to quota the victim or "consequences".

Drug testing instructs pursuit, to probe the consequence in order to avoid or evade the search of causes.

Drug testing infiltrates title and deed to sabotage the pursuit of custody.

Any schematic of distraction to corrupt the logic of pursuit only rules against the lawful order of custody for the purpose of harboring a fugitive.and endorsing the propaganda to pledge allegiance to the imposter.

Drug testing quotas the consequences.

To seduce a drug user, is to allow the drug supply, in order to sponsor the recruit or entrapment of the user.

To apprehend the causes prevents the consequences, but to pursue the consequences only affords or allows the causes.

Drug supply recruits the drug user.

The drug user does not introduce the drug supply.

The drug user is a consequence and not a cause.

Evidence is determined by the cause and never the consequence.

Any system that inclines the pursuit to detect the drug user implies willful misconduct to promote sedition mutiny, and counterfeit.

Any process of custody or evidence that recruits the drug user or consequences, instead of apprehending the causes; drug maker and or sources of supply is the progress of fraudulent investment, for promoting entrapment; and harboring the fugitives of drug supply; in order to promote the sedition of counterfeit title and deed.

The logic of evidence is the ability to implicate the causes as opposed to the consequences.

Any legislation that endorses the promotion of drug testing violates the logic of custody and is further classified as the convention of sedition; mutiny; for promoting counterfeit title and deed; and the conspiracy to overthrow controlling asset of a government body.

Drug testing is used to corrupt the logic of pursuit in order to sabotage the progress of custody, for the purpose of falsifying controlling asset of title and deed.

Drug testing endorses bribe, blackmail, and blackball by falsifying the logic of pursuit in order to counterfeit the controlling asset of a territory, regimental commission or province.

Drug testing promotes sedition and mutiny by falsifying the logic of custody regarding or related to the govern or controlling asset of a common wealth or province.

Drug testing violates article 94 of the uniform code of military justice.

Drug testing is considered to be a trespass against United States congress and is subject to the penalties of treason.

Since it's NOT illegal, is there an actual question among that rambling?

__________________
While pointers can be helpful, ultimately the number one lesson in any legal action is: don't take legal advice from books, family, friends, co-workers, police officers, grocery clerks, web sites, or people on legal message boards. The only person who can give YOU legal advice is YOUR attorney.

http://www.aardvarc.org

The testing is not violating human rights in my opinion. It's non-discriminatory and provides protection for the general population that, for example, your kids in kindergarden are not supervised by drug addicts.

It's possible for everybody to get a "clean" test by waiting a sufficient period of time (max. a couple of months). Furthermore, it adds a disincentive for people who use illegal substances.

I think it's a hazzle, and I would personally prefer not to work for a company that does "random drug tests", but I think it should be legal and that it is okay for the employer to have that piece of information.

"Vices of the Self Righteous"

:eyesroll:

Statistical justification to establish such premises is always neglected and those whom you casually refer to as "drug addicts" are not dysfunctional simply because they engage in behaviours in their personal time for which another may disagree.

During alcohol prohibition those such as your ilk would be slandering the speak easy attendants as drunks, boozers, and moral reprobates based upon a self endowed absolution for judgement.

To further justify the depravity for uniform fetishes by puritanical megalomaniacs, state's law is referenced without objectivity for its legal positivism - a pretentiousness that law, simply because they have been instituted, represents some ethical absolute.

The Department of Transportation has specific criteria for someone to be added to a pool for random drug tests and that specific criteria is for "safety" when one is responsible for the transport of other persons (pilots, train conductors, air traffic controllers, etc.) or for "security".


** Fundamentals of Prejudice **

The ability of private institutions to hire or fire at will is based upon free association and one may be dismissed for race, ethnicity, or creed - perhaps when a corporation is sold.

Only the government has policies against such actions which it also exacts upon its subcontractors, and the government also has policies against random drug tests unless those individuals fit into specific task categories.


** Incidence and Bias **

The volume of drugs used by society and its effects contradicts, by statistics, an assertion from those who deem drugs to be catastrophic with a high degree of significance.

Verily, the creation of criminal organizations, the economic and personal devastation caused by prosecution of those who become expunged from employment and alienated from family, and by the siphon of public funds to preserve an authoritarian power structure with its help itself to a pay check business model, is more detrimental to society than is relying upon personal volition to recover from a behavioural vice.

The economic sabotage arranged by congress and the banking system is exponentially more to blame for personal loss than casual drug use - excluding prosecution.

__________________
genetic religion - genetic existence is a necessary condition for the strong anthropic principle